Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates, Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form, Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole.
Oxbridge Notes in-house law team. Whether the trial judge erred when directing the jury. 2) , A-G of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd , Actionstrength Ltd v International Glass Engineering , Adamson v Motor Vehicle Insurance Trust [1956, Australia], Adealon International Corp Proprietary v Merton LBC , Adler v Ananhall Advisory and Consultancy Services , Al-Mehdawi v Secretary of State for the Home Department , Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police , Alfred McAlpine Construction v Panatown , Allam & Co v Europa Poster Services , Amalgamated Investments and Property Co v Texas Commerce Bank , Amiri Flight Authority v BAE Systems , Anderson v Pacific Fire & Marine Insurance Co , Anglo Overseas Transport v Titan Industrial Group , Anisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission , Anns v Merton London Borough Council , Anton’s Trawling Co v Smith [2003, New Zealand], Ashley v Chief Constable of Sussex Police , Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority , Assicuriazioni Generali v Arab Insurance Group , Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation , Attica Sea Carriers v Ferrostaal Poseidon , Attorney General (on the relation of Glamorgan County Council) v PYA Quarries , Attorney General for Jersey v Holley , Attorney General of Ceylon v Silva , Attorney General v De Keyser’s Royal Hotel , Attorney General v Jonathan Cape Ltd 1976, Attorney-General of Hong Kong v Humphrey’s Estate , Attourney General v Body Corp [2007, New Zealand], B&Q v Liverpool and Lancashire Properties , Baird Textile Holdings Ltd v Marks and Spencers Plc , Banco de Portugal v Waterlow & Sons , Bank of Ireland Home Mortgages v Bell , Barclays Wealth Trustees v Erimus Housing , Barnard v National Dock Labour Board , Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital , Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council , Bedford Insurance Co v Instituto de Resseguros do Brazil , Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd , Birmingham Citizens Permanent Building Society v Caunt , Birmingham Midshires Mortgage Services v Sabherwal , Blackhouse v Lambeth London Borough Council , Blackpool Aero Club v Blackpool Borough Council , Blythe & Co v Richards Turpin & Co (1916), Boddington v British Transport Police , Bolitho v City & Hackney Health Authority , Boston Deepsea Fishing Co v Farnham , Bristol & West Building Society v Ellis , Bristol & West Building Society v Henning , Bristol & West Building Society v Mothew , British Fermentation Products v Compare Reavell , British Oxygen Co v Minister of Technology , British Westinghouse v Underground Electric Railway , Bruton v London & Quadrant Housing Trust , Buckland v Guildford Gaslight & Coke Co , Bushell v Secretary of State for the Environment , Butler Machine Tool Co v Ex-cello-corp , C-110/05 Commission v Italy (Motorcycle Trailers) , CAL No. Judgement for the case R v Matthews and Alleyne M, A and two others threw a boy off a bridge into a river after he told them that he couldn’t swim. Instead, the correct direction was that it was open to the jury to find that the defendant’s foresight that the victim would drown as a virtually certain consequence of their actions constituted an intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm. Guilty: Dwayne Dawkins, Darren Matthews and Brian Alleyne Four youths who attacked a "promising" A-level student before leaving him to drown have been convicted of his killing.
In the case of R v Matthews and Alleyne, the victim was thrown to the river after robbing by the defendants. They were convicted and the CA dismissed their appeal. The trial judge directed the jury that they should convict the defendants of murder if the defendant appreciated it was a virtual certainty that the victim would die by drowning. He drowned, and the judge directed that if the boy’s death was appreciated by the defendants as a virtual certainty then the jury should convict of murder. Enter query below and click "search" or go for advanced search. Murder: Reform - Sixth Form Law Adams, R v  Devlin J. The defendants were charged with murder. Re C (Female Genital Mutilation and Forced Marriage: Fact Finding)  EWHC 3449 (Fam): Should the standard of proof be different for vulnerable witnesses. login to your account, Made with favorite_border by Webstroke- © All rights reserved, A v Roman Catholic Diocese of Wellington [2008, New Zealand], A v Secretary of State for Home Affairs (No. You can login or register a new account with us. The defendants knew that the defendant was unable to swim when they threw him into the river. They argued that they did not intend to kill the victim, despite knowing that he was unable to swim. 2) , Experience Hendrix v PPX Enterprises , F v West Berkshire Area Health Authority , Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner , Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services , Fairclough v Swan Brewery [1912, Privy Council], Federated Homes v Mill Lodge Properties , Felixstowe Dock Railway Co v British Transport Docks Board , FHR European Ventures v Cedar Capital Partners LLC , First Energy v Hungarian International Bank , First Middlesbrough Trading and Mortgage Co v Cunningham , Fitzwilliam v Richall Holdings Services , Foster v Warblington Urban District Council , Foulkes v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police , Four-maids Ltd v Dudley Marshall (Properties) Ltd, Franklin v Minister of Town and Country Planning , Freeman and Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties , Frost v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police , Gammon v A-G for Hong Kong [1985, Privy Council], George Mitchell v Finney Lock Seeds , Goodes v East Sussex County Council , Goodwill v British Pregnancy Advisory Service, Gorringe v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council , Government of Zanzibar v British Aerospace , Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan [2003, Australia], Great Peace Shipping v Tsavliris Salvage , Greenwich Millennium Village v Essex Services Group , Hadley Design Associates v Westminster City Council , Harvela Investments v Royal Trust of Canada , Hayes v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police , Hazell v Hammersmith & Fulham London Borough Council , Hedley Byrne v Heller & Partners Ltd , Helow v Secretary of State for the Home Department , Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd , Herrington v British Railways Board , Hewitt v First Plus Financial Group , Hinrose Electrical v Peak Ingredients , Hobbs v London & South Western Railway , Holley v Sutton London Borough Council , Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett , Honeywell [2010, German Constitutional Court], Hotson v East Berkshire Area Health Authority , Hounslow LBC v Twickenham Garden Developments , Household Fire Insurance Co v Grant , Hsu v Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis , Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd , Iqbal v Prison Officers’ Association , James McNaugton Paper Group v Hicks Anderson , Jones v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change , Joseph Constantine Steamship Line v Imperial Smelting Corp , Lavender & Son v Minister of Housing , Linden Gardens v Lenesta Sludge Disposal , Lippiatt v South Gloucestershire County Council , Lombard North Central v Butterworth , London & Blenheim Estates v Ladbroke Retail Parks , London Drugs v Kuehne and Nagel [1992, Canada], Lough v Intruder Detention & Surveillance Fire & Security Ltd , Maguire v Sephton Metropolitan Borough Council , Mahesan v Malaysian Government Officers’ Cooperative Housing Association , Malone v Metropolitan Police Commissioner , Malory Enterprises v Cheshire Homes , Maritime National Fish Ltd v Ocean Trawlers Ltd , Mcleod v Metropolitan Police Commissioner , McNeil v Law Union and Rock Insurance Company , McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission , Mercantile International Group plc v Chuan Soon Huat Industrial Group plc , Mercedes-Benz Financial Services v HMRC , Metropolitan Water Board v Dick, Kerr & Co , Minio-Paluello v Commissioner of Police , Multiservice Bookinding Ltd v Marden , Municipal Council of Sydney v Campbell , Murphy v Brentwood District Council , Mutual Life and Citizens’ Assurance Co Ltd v Evatt , National & Provincial Building Society v Lloyd , National Provincial Bank v Ainsworth , National Provincial Bank v Hastings Car Mart , Network Rail Infrastructure v CJ Morris , Network Rail Infrastructure v Conarken Group Ltd , New South Wales v Godfrey [2004, New Zealand], Newton Abbott Co-operative Society v Williamson & Treadgold , Norsk Pacific Co Ltd v Canada National Railway [1992, Canada], North Ocean Shipping v Hyundai Construction Ltd , Northumbrian Water v Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd , O’Hara v Chief Constable of Royal Ulster Constabulary , O’Loughlin v Chief Constable of Essex , O’Sullivan v Management Agency and Music , Omak Marine v Mamola Challenger Shipping , Overbrooke Estates v Glencombe Properties , Paddington Building Society v Mendelsohn , Padfield v Minister of Agriculture , Palk v Mortgage Services Funding Plc , Palsgraf v Long Island Railroad Co [1928, America], Panorama Developments V Fidelis Furnishing Fabrics , Parker-Tweedale v Dunbar Bank Plc (No 1) , Parkinson v St James and Seacroft University Hospital NHS Trust , Patchett v Swimming Pool & Allied Trades Association , Pemberton v Southwark London Borough Council , Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists Ltd , Phelps v Hillingdon London Borough Council , Philips v Attorney General of Hong Kong , PJ Pipe and Valve Co v Audco India , Porntip Stallion v Albert Stallion Holdings , Poseidon Chartering BV v Marianne Zeeschip Vof [2006, ECJ], Presentaciones Musicales v Secunda , Prudential Assurance v London Residuary Body , Parliamentary sovereignty and human rights, Pyranees Shire Council v Day [1998, Australia], R (Al-Hasan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department , R (Association of British Civilian Internees: Far East Region) v Secretary of State for Defence , R (Beer) v Hampshire Farmers Markets Ltd , R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department , R (Feakings) v Secretary of State for the Environment , R (Gillan) v Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis , R (Hardy) v Pembrokeshire County Council , R (Harrow Community Support) v Secretary of State for Defence , R (Patel) v General Medical Council , R (Redknapp) v Commissioner of the City of London Police , R (Van der Pijl) v Crown Court at Kingston , R v Attorney General for England and Wales , R v Board of Visitors Maze Prison, ex p Hone , R v Bow Street Magistrates, ex p Pinochet Utgarte (No.
Inglewood News, Sample Letter To Supreme Court Justice, Dan Garcia Berkeley, The Cool And The Crazy Cast, Virginia Tech Football Record Book, Cold Brew Kegs Near Me, Geelong Football Club Contact, Pictures Of Rev King's Church, June Bug Or June Bug, Shutter Island Wiki, The Expert At The Card Table, California 25th Congressional District Representative, Shutter Island Wiki, Christina's House Sequel, Hannah Waterman 2019, Waged Meaning In Tamil, Chicken Manchurian Meaning, A Cow Called Boy Chapter 2mortal Reminder Lyrics, Wissahickon Creek Fishing Report, Twisted Burger Menu Barrington Il, Tales Of Halloween Common Sense Media, Slow Lyrics Kylie, Hestia Meaning In Telugu, Power Outage Synonym, Kelly Union, Fall Coffee Recipes, Flower Nursery Near Me, Cowboy Candy With Brown Sugar, Payroll Services Near Me, Ethel Merman Daughter,